An autonomous quadcopter following the trajectory y=0.5x2 on x∈[−4,4] detects a stationary transmission pylon at (0,4) (coordinates in decameters, 1 dam=10 m). We determine the closest point of approach (CPA) and minimum clearance distance using the Squared-Distance Optimization Technique and the Second Derivative Test, verifying compliance with the 2.0-dam (20-m) collision-avoidance safety margin.
Step-by-Step Mathematical Solution
Step 1: Formulate the Euclidean Distance Function
The Euclidean distance between the pylon at (x0,y0)=(0,4) and any point (x,y) along the flight path is:
All three critical numbers lie strictly within the operational flight corridor [−4,4].
Step 4: Classify Critical Points via the Second Derivative Test
Compute the second derivative:
D′′(x)=3x2−6
Evaluate D′′(x) at each critical number:
At x=0:
D′′(0)=3(0)2−6=−6<0
Because D′′(0)<0, the flight path directly beneath the pylon at (0,0) represents a local maximum of the distance function among the stationary points (d=16=4 dam).
At x=±6:
D′′(±6)=3(6)−6=18−6=12>0
Because D′′(±6)>0, both symmetrical points represent local minima.
Step 5: Evaluate Coordinates, Endpoints, and Safety Margin
Evaluate the trajectory altitude y=0.5x2 at the critical numbers:
y=0.5(±6)2=0.5(6)=3 dam
The two closest points of approach on the drone trajectory are:
P1(−6,3)≈(−2.45,3.00) damandP2(6,3)≈(2.45,3.00) dam
Safety Clearance: The minimum physical distance between the UAV and the high-voltage transmission pylon is 26.46 meters (2.646 dam). Because this clearance exceeds the required minimum safety buffer of 20.0 meters (2.0 dam), the navigation flight computer does not trigger an emergency trajectory abort.
LiDAR Firmware Optimization: Computing D(x)=[d(x)]2 rather than d(x) allows embedded flight microcontrollers to execute real-time collision checks in simple polynomial arithmetic, saving processor cycles and reducing latency in obstacle avoidance pipelines.